Exh 4pr gender

Ultimately we see our world in an interesting situation: the predominant 
gender of modernity is expressed as a re-extension of its initial conception, is quickly eroding and, in some cases, is about to explode, or maybe has already exploded. 

We find ourselves on a transition between the hypermodern and the postmodern, and we do not have any idea where the truth and where the reality is found at this point. 

So, in a postmodern construction of gender, there will not be any traditional concepts of gender

Picture this scenario: the archetype of ‘the man’ falls to pieces, which do not inhabit parts of the whole for any longer, but symbolize merely themselves. 

Conservative forces may stand up for this archetype, demand the masculinity to make a comeback — this ordinary, affluent white person — yet thereby, they just attempt to keep up with modernity through gender reconstructions. 

This perdicament breeds nihilism and again the Fourth Political Theory moves onward. 

Maybe we can take a step in the direction of gender as Dasein, despite the notorious representations and opprobrium that we would stir up. 

By moving beyond the limits of gender which we are familiar with, we arrive at the domain of 
uncertainty, androgyny, and sex possibly in relation to the angels. I

In the same realm, it is a must to find a gender of the Fourth Political Theory, 
namely by taking risky actions in gazing behind the limits of the collapsed chimera 
of modernity. 

We might as yet provide only frameworks: we believe that the gender of Dasein and trajectory, that this gender represents a root reality, that it is part of the I’imaginaire. By extending our investigation, we can give thought to the question about the gender of the Radical Self, which is beyond the basic paradigms 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exh bizaroousay

(from  Wikipedia ): "Despite their differences, Bizarro and Superman have teamed up on occasion. One notable example happened in Superman #379, when a strange creature appeared to be devouring Bizarros. Fearing he would end up alone Bizarro tried to steal Superman's duplicator ray. Superman convinced Bizarro he would be better off trying to stop the monster before making any more Bizarros.  The creature eventually devoured Bizarro, but Superman soon figured out that the creature was not trying to kill the Bizarros, but using their combined strength to defeat another creature which was trying to destroy htraE. The first creature was created as part of a plan developed by none other than the Bizarro Lex Luthor, who Bizarro referred to as a "punk hero." "In the imaginary story, Superman: Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?, which served as an ending to Silver Age Superman continuity, Bizarro #1 (the original Bizarro and the world's leader/greatest hero),
Read more

Exh demwmw

Saying that Joe Biden is better choice for the left wing than DJT instead of saying they are equally bad choices for the left wing, is excessive centrism and condemnable  Republicans take 10 steps backwards, Democrats take 1 step forward. Liberal 2.0ers call that progress. Leftists like me call it a f*cking disgrace. A lot of things that the Democrats campaign on and take credit for, were by and large grassroots campaigns by progressive groups. For example, the DNC really fought a lot of state-wide decriminalization attempts, that's why the first legalized states had to use voter referendums. Then you got issues like abortion and gay marriage, which were undone by the courts and NEVER codified into law by the Democrats, despite having many opportunities to do so. The DNC are NOT allies to us leftists, they are dangerous. Perhaps the Democrats are more dangerous than the GOP, since the Democrats take up the space of a left party, while they ignore grassroots leftist organizing and g
Read more

Exh libfemdfni

from here There is a practical component to all of this. The question of humanism vs antihumanism is the question upon which the debate between liberal feminism and nihilist gender abolitionism will be based. The liberal feminist says “I am a woman” and by that means that they are spiritually, ontologically, metaphysically, genetically, or any other modes of “essentially” a woman. The gender nihilist says “I am a woman” and means that they are located within a certain position in a matrix of power which constitutes them as such. The liberal feminist is not aware of the ways power creates gender, and thus clings to gender as a means of legitimizing themselves in the eyes of power. They rely on trying to use various systems of knowledge (genetic sciences, metaphysical claims about the soul, kantian ontology) in order to prove to power they can operate within it. The gender nihilist, the gender abolitionist, looks at the system of gender itself and see’s the violence at its core. We say n
Read more