Base Eddie? Swnoden?

 

Both sides narrative:

I am guessing to him the both sides are just as bad however considering his situation  you have to realize he is fairly biased towards not liking the US government in general 

If anyone has a reason to still be mad about Hillary it's Edward Snowden.

So take that fact in mind and realize you should not be listening to a thing Snowden says about the US election or government honestly now since he seems to be fully spite driven nowadays

Edward Snowden's a smart guy (outside of politics at least), he should be able to realize that one side can be bad while still being better than the other side.

Snowden is mad at the system, honestly his anger is more valid than a lot of the "viva la revolution" larpers in the US. He actually did things, physically took a risk, stood on his principles, stuff didn't pan out how he thought it should've and he's understandably angry and he is acting on that anger. It's why I said what can be done within in reason about the issue, rather than lament and argue uselessly about it.

Even if Snowden still wants to be a reasonable man, I'm going to guess he won't agree to look favourably on the US and it's government unless he is granted full amnesty and could maybe even want other stuff on account of how long he has been in exile. What do you think should be done?

And yes, there is some justifiable anger towards the U.S. gov on his end. I don’t agree with what the NSA was doing either. What I’m saying is him being mad at the system doesn’t justify equating Dems and Republicans during now of all times, where Republicans have slid so far to the right and have tried to undermine our electoral process.

If people think what Snowden is doing is okay, then no we don't agree. What he's doing is wrong. At best he's being stupid, blinded by spite. At worst he's attempting to make things worse intentionally. I don't care if Snowden has a justifiable reason to hate the U.S. government, what he's doing is wrong and bad.

*** If you want to make the biggest and most impactful difference you can make sure all your friends and family IRL get their votes cast today. This bolded part is the only part that matters till polls close today ***

What the US government also did to him was wrong and bad. I am guessing entire swaths of the world wish literal death upon the US, and they have every right to. You seem to think there is a moral objective good that aligns for the entire world in geopolitics and politics in general when there is not. Remember when Hasan caught all that flack for saying "America deserved 9/11." US government policies whether foreign or domestic have been the cause of most of the US's greatest adversaries since World War 2. This is another example of that.

Yeah what Snowden is doing is not good but I understand the anger behind it and that he wants to burn the institution that betrayed him to the ground, and spite the US citizens who didn't even do anything to demand amnesty for him for being a whistle blower.

Like honestly man what have you done in your life that compares to what Snowden has done in terms of standing on your principles, sacrifice and taking a risk? I can't even imagine what he is going through and here you are being so sanctimonious, and uselessly too. What Snowden is doing is okay and good for him probably, it's not okay and good for the US but the reason it's him vs the US is the US government not abiding by its own whistle blower protection policy. Politics and geopolitics is complicated stuff, ground your beliefs in something concrete and realize other people's goals are not always going to align with you. The best case scenario will be peaceful compromise the worst case scenario will be bloodshed. This is literally the human condition mate.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exh demwmw

Saying that Joe Biden is better choice for the left wing than DJT instead of saying they are equally bad choices for the left wing, is excessive centrism and condemnable  Republicans take 10 steps backwards, Democrats take 1 step forward. Liberal 2.0ers call that progress. Leftists like me call it a f*cking disgrace. A lot of things that the Democrats campaign on and take credit for, were by and large grassroots campaigns by progressive groups. For example, the DNC really fought a lot of state-wide decriminalization attempts, that's why the first legalized states had to use voter referendums. Then you got issues like abortion and gay marriage, which were undone by the courts and NEVER codified into law by the Democrats, despite having many opportunities to do so. The DNC are NOT allies to us leftists, they are dangerous. Perhaps the Democrats are more dangerous than the GOP, since the Democrats take up the space of a left party, while they ignore grassroots leftist organizing and g
Read more

Exh bizaroousay

(from  Wikipedia ): "Despite their differences, Bizarro and Superman have teamed up on occasion. One notable example happened in Superman #379, when a strange creature appeared to be devouring Bizarros. Fearing he would end up alone Bizarro tried to steal Superman's duplicator ray. Superman convinced Bizarro he would be better off trying to stop the monster before making any more Bizarros.  The creature eventually devoured Bizarro, but Superman soon figured out that the creature was not trying to kill the Bizarros, but using their combined strength to defeat another creature which was trying to destroy htraE. The first creature was created as part of a plan developed by none other than the Bizarro Lex Luthor, who Bizarro referred to as a "punk hero." "In the imaginary story, Superman: Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?, which served as an ending to Silver Age Superman continuity, Bizarro #1 (the original Bizarro and the world's leader/greatest hero),
Read more

Exh libfemdfni

from here There is a practical component to all of this. The question of humanism vs antihumanism is the question upon which the debate between liberal feminism and nihilist gender abolitionism will be based. The liberal feminist says “I am a woman” and by that means that they are spiritually, ontologically, metaphysically, genetically, or any other modes of “essentially” a woman. The gender nihilist says “I am a woman” and means that they are located within a certain position in a matrix of power which constitutes them as such. The liberal feminist is not aware of the ways power creates gender, and thus clings to gender as a means of legitimizing themselves in the eyes of power. They rely on trying to use various systems of knowledge (genetic sciences, metaphysical claims about the soul, kantian ontology) in order to prove to power they can operate within it. The gender nihilist, the gender abolitionist, looks at the system of gender itself and see’s the violence at its core. We say n
Read more