Anti right when right

I dont think conservatism is at its core directly linked to authoritarianism but it appears that the republican party is seeping themselves more and more in authoritarianism each year

I am a left libertarian, but I’ve seen right wing libertarians who disagree with me on items and I always seek common ground because that’s the way you build a society - leave your pipe dreams on the down low and work for what we agree on. Something that Congress could take page out of

Libertarians as a whole need gatekeeping to keep us from idiot authoritarians (i.e conservatives) who try to identify as being libertarian. Because of cons, everyone who isn't libertarian always associates libertarianism as a whole with conservativism and believes they are the same despite the fact they're 2 very different ideologies. 

DJT is not libertarian. He reinforces a police state while he has made our government much bigger. He's created provactive tariffs, he has banned bump stocks and he supports other types of gun control, he has deployed thousands of military people in the middle east and he has increased the military budget, he continues the endless wars, the national debt has ballooned into trillions, and so on, h

He has bad optics and more

Conservatives have also stolen the gadsden flag and made it into a highly authoritarian symbol. Capitalists can be (right) libertarian, Socialists can be (left) libertarian, authoritarians are NOT libertarian. "Jo Jorgensen pretends to be is supportive of BLM? that is a turn off to some libertarians or maybe just conservative libertarians who stopped supporting her over that. She pretends to be is supportive of their movement not their organization . For me, I don't like her because she's a right libertarian, not because of her virtue signaling to a group (BLM) that rightfully believes that Jo Jorgensen is a racist pig

She is certainly not a "Marxist" (though on the economy if she is 'so far right she's left' that would mean to me she is a Left Marxist, which to Marxism is what Left Communism is to Communism (see horseshoe theory for more)

People can be as conservative or progressive as they so desire. As long as they keep promoting voluntary interaction and the protection of our individual rights, then they are pushing libertarian ideals.

In other words ... as bad as it is, a person can be against all types of marriage equality if they want. No one else can dictate to them what their values/beliefs are. Their beliefs only hold weight in relation to libertarianism as if they are trying to force such hideous beliefs/practices onto others.

Right Wingers are a problem in particular because they are a threat to use reigning in Left wing economics like Socialism/Communism, abolishing classes and the state, abolishing NATO, ending imperialism and interventionism, (along with them being too Zionist and Anti Palestinian) , reigning in the Queer theory, Marxist Feminism, Xenofeminism postgenderism, mutual aide etc

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exh demwmw

Saying that Joe Biden is better choice for the left wing than DJT instead of saying they are equally bad choices for the left wing, is excessive centrism and condemnable  Republicans take 10 steps backwards, Democrats take 1 step forward. Liberal 2.0ers call that progress. Leftists like me call it a f*cking disgrace. A lot of things that the Democrats campaign on and take credit for, were by and large grassroots campaigns by progressive groups. For example, the DNC really fought a lot of state-wide decriminalization attempts, that's why the first legalized states had to use voter referendums. Then you got issues like abortion and gay marriage, which were undone by the courts and NEVER codified into law by the Democrats, despite having many opportunities to do so. The DNC are NOT allies to us leftists, they are dangerous. Perhaps the Democrats are more dangerous than the GOP, since the Democrats take up the space of a left party, while they ignore grassroots leftist organizing and g
Read more

Exh bizaroousay

(from  Wikipedia ): "Despite their differences, Bizarro and Superman have teamed up on occasion. One notable example happened in Superman #379, when a strange creature appeared to be devouring Bizarros. Fearing he would end up alone Bizarro tried to steal Superman's duplicator ray. Superman convinced Bizarro he would be better off trying to stop the monster before making any more Bizarros.  The creature eventually devoured Bizarro, but Superman soon figured out that the creature was not trying to kill the Bizarros, but using their combined strength to defeat another creature which was trying to destroy htraE. The first creature was created as part of a plan developed by none other than the Bizarro Lex Luthor, who Bizarro referred to as a "punk hero." "In the imaginary story, Superman: Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?, which served as an ending to Silver Age Superman continuity, Bizarro #1 (the original Bizarro and the world's leader/greatest hero),
Read more

Exh libfemdfni

from here There is a practical component to all of this. The question of humanism vs antihumanism is the question upon which the debate between liberal feminism and nihilist gender abolitionism will be based. The liberal feminist says “I am a woman” and by that means that they are spiritually, ontologically, metaphysically, genetically, or any other modes of “essentially” a woman. The gender nihilist says “I am a woman” and means that they are located within a certain position in a matrix of power which constitutes them as such. The liberal feminist is not aware of the ways power creates gender, and thus clings to gender as a means of legitimizing themselves in the eyes of power. They rely on trying to use various systems of knowledge (genetic sciences, metaphysical claims about the soul, kantian ontology) in order to prove to power they can operate within it. The gender nihilist, the gender abolitionist, looks at the system of gender itself and see’s the violence at its core. We say n
Read more