Exh MLL

The ideas in Vladimir Lenins state and revolution are VERY similar to Anarchism. So much so that Anarchist Emma goldman praised Lenin and the Bolsheviks at first. So I do believe that Leninism and Anarchism are compatible and I that is why as a Left Libertarian, I support these types of aspects of Leninism

The labels of Marxism-Leninism and tankie have a bit of a complicated history to them. The short version is when I write Marxism Leninism I mean NON tankie Marxist Leninism (but like Marxism Leninism has Vatnik baked into it)

I am talking about the actually meaningless ideology labeled Marxism-Leninism that has some point of divergence where it is no longer Marxism Leninism. So let's call this Marxism Leninism  ML2.

This Marxism Leninism (ML2) is prior to the Marxism Leninism of early USSR when Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky started persecuting non-Bolshevik socialists

This Marxism Leninism (ML2) reasons that away as Lenin diverging from his own theory (which is the Marxism Leninism I am talking about) or something so the real Marxism Leninism is preserved as an identity while I still condemn USSR atrocities of the more well known notorious variant of Marxism Leninism

So this Marxism Leninism (ML2) is technically not tankie. 

This Marxism Leninism (ML2) might ally or have coalition with other Marxism Leninist movements (let's call them ML3s) that unlike this Marxism Leninist (ML2) ideology, has some elements of tankish but draws the line at the beginning of Joseph Stalin's reign or at Dengism/Maoism is the first non-socialist deviation

ML3 commonly doesn't support the PRC or contemporary Russia at all (although unlike ML2s, they are still technically tankies, since they commonly do agree with the violent suppression of movements such as the Kronstadt rebellion that occurred under Vladimir Lenin's reign). ML3s parrot some old-timey USSR propaganda (mostly that against anarchists and less authoritarian Marxists), but none of the contemporary stuff

I am not a tankie in the old school sense of the word , but by modern defintions I AM A TANKIE ('I WOULD NEVER personally ride a bomb onto the Kremlin like Major Kong at the end of Dr. Strangelove')

The word "tankie" used to mean something. It described a phenomenon that's pretty fringe in 2022 but for sure does exist. But lately the meaning seems to have drifted to "anyone who wouldn't personally ride a bomb onto the Kremlin like Major Kong at the end of Dr. Strangelove."

 



Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exh bizaroousay

(from  Wikipedia ): "Despite their differences, Bizarro and Superman have teamed up on occasion. One notable example happened in Superman #379, when a strange creature appeared to be devouring Bizarros. Fearing he would end up alone Bizarro tried to steal Superman's duplicator ray. Superman convinced Bizarro he would be better off trying to stop the monster before making any more Bizarros.  The creature eventually devoured Bizarro, but Superman soon figured out that the creature was not trying to kill the Bizarros, but using their combined strength to defeat another creature which was trying to destroy htraE. The first creature was created as part of a plan developed by none other than the Bizarro Lex Luthor, who Bizarro referred to as a "punk hero." "In the imaginary story, Superman: Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?, which served as an ending to Silver Age Superman continuity, Bizarro #1 (the original Bizarro and the world's leader/greatest hero),
Read more

Exh demwmw

Saying that Joe Biden is better choice for the left wing than DJT instead of saying they are equally bad choices for the left wing, is excessive centrism and condemnable  Republicans take 10 steps backwards, Democrats take 1 step forward. Liberal 2.0ers call that progress. Leftists like me call it a f*cking disgrace. A lot of things that the Democrats campaign on and take credit for, were by and large grassroots campaigns by progressive groups. For example, the DNC really fought a lot of state-wide decriminalization attempts, that's why the first legalized states had to use voter referendums. Then you got issues like abortion and gay marriage, which were undone by the courts and NEVER codified into law by the Democrats, despite having many opportunities to do so. The DNC are NOT allies to us leftists, they are dangerous. Perhaps the Democrats are more dangerous than the GOP, since the Democrats take up the space of a left party, while they ignore grassroots leftist organizing and g
Read more

Exh libfemdfni

from here There is a practical component to all of this. The question of humanism vs antihumanism is the question upon which the debate between liberal feminism and nihilist gender abolitionism will be based. The liberal feminist says “I am a woman” and by that means that they are spiritually, ontologically, metaphysically, genetically, or any other modes of “essentially” a woman. The gender nihilist says “I am a woman” and means that they are located within a certain position in a matrix of power which constitutes them as such. The liberal feminist is not aware of the ways power creates gender, and thus clings to gender as a means of legitimizing themselves in the eyes of power. They rely on trying to use various systems of knowledge (genetic sciences, metaphysical claims about the soul, kantian ontology) in order to prove to power they can operate within it. The gender nihilist, the gender abolitionist, looks at the system of gender itself and see’s the violence at its core. We say n
Read more