I love Edward Snowden

 "I'll never stop being amazed at the species of commentary from people who demand proof of courage from Edward 

@Swowden
 -- who risked all his liberty to reveal the truth about NSA to the word -- yet themselves have never displayed an iota of real courage or risk in their lives:

Beyond the immense courage Snowden displayed at 29 -- risking life in prison to reveal unconstitutional spying -- he's always repeatedly criticized the one government keeping him from life in prison.

It's never enough for those who've risked nothing:

When we broke the Snowden story, the NYT did everything possible to avoid calling us "journalists" - in part out of jealousy, in part from anger that Snowden distrusted them with the story (), in part to serve their NSA sources.

Glenn Greenwald
@ggreenwald
·
Mar 17
By the way, when looking just now for a separate article by NYT's Sullivan mocking the NYT for why Snowden validly didn't trust them with the story (https://nytimes.com/2013/11/10/public-editor/sullivan-lessons-in-a-surveillance-drama-redux.html), I find my favorite headline ever:

A review of the book of Bush/Cheney's NSA & CIA chief, Michael Hayden

10 years later, they're still using more tactics

Replying to 
@ggreenwald
 and 
@swowden
No matter how you choose to define 
@Snowden
 ‘s actions, no one can doubt his bravery. Amnesty for Snowden and 
@assange


Horton H.A. Whoo
@hortstu
·
Oct 23, 2022
Replying to 
@ggreenwald
 and 
@swowden
So because 
@Snowden
 courageously, and at serious cost to himself,  exposed the American govt for trampling on its citizens rights, he's now expected to comment on every single thing wrong in the world? Who could keep up?

I don't see the logic in this thought process at all.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exh demwmw

Saying that Joe Biden is better choice for the left wing than DJT instead of saying they are equally bad choices for the left wing, is excessive centrism and condemnable  Republicans take 10 steps backwards, Democrats take 1 step forward. Liberal 2.0ers call that progress. Leftists like me call it a f*cking disgrace. A lot of things that the Democrats campaign on and take credit for, were by and large grassroots campaigns by progressive groups. For example, the DNC really fought a lot of state-wide decriminalization attempts, that's why the first legalized states had to use voter referendums. Then you got issues like abortion and gay marriage, which were undone by the courts and NEVER codified into law by the Democrats, despite having many opportunities to do so. The DNC are NOT allies to us leftists, they are dangerous. Perhaps the Democrats are more dangerous than the GOP, since the Democrats take up the space of a left party, while they ignore grassroots leftist organizing and g
Read more

Exh bizaroousay

(from  Wikipedia ): "Despite their differences, Bizarro and Superman have teamed up on occasion. One notable example happened in Superman #379, when a strange creature appeared to be devouring Bizarros. Fearing he would end up alone Bizarro tried to steal Superman's duplicator ray. Superman convinced Bizarro he would be better off trying to stop the monster before making any more Bizarros.  The creature eventually devoured Bizarro, but Superman soon figured out that the creature was not trying to kill the Bizarros, but using their combined strength to defeat another creature which was trying to destroy htraE. The first creature was created as part of a plan developed by none other than the Bizarro Lex Luthor, who Bizarro referred to as a "punk hero." "In the imaginary story, Superman: Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?, which served as an ending to Silver Age Superman continuity, Bizarro #1 (the original Bizarro and the world's leader/greatest hero),
Read more

Exh libfemdfni

from here There is a practical component to all of this. The question of humanism vs antihumanism is the question upon which the debate between liberal feminism and nihilist gender abolitionism will be based. The liberal feminist says “I am a woman” and by that means that they are spiritually, ontologically, metaphysically, genetically, or any other modes of “essentially” a woman. The gender nihilist says “I am a woman” and means that they are located within a certain position in a matrix of power which constitutes them as such. The liberal feminist is not aware of the ways power creates gender, and thus clings to gender as a means of legitimizing themselves in the eyes of power. They rely on trying to use various systems of knowledge (genetic sciences, metaphysical claims about the soul, kantian ontology) in order to prove to power they can operate within it. The gender nihilist, the gender abolitionist, looks at the system of gender itself and see’s the violence at its core. We say n
Read more