Republican party platforms

I support this alternate history fantasy world Republican party .

Now, while I support that alternate history fantasy world Republican party, I would strongly prefer that our reality's Republican party be like the left wing Republican parties I write below (either like Republican platform 1 or Republican platform 2) instead of being like the alternate history fantasy world Republican party I support (since that alternate history fantasy world Republican party above is not left wing enough for me to support in our reality)

Instead I want the Republican party to let me create a left wing takeover of it by embracing one of the 2 platforms below . I am doing this to move the Republican Party left of the Democrat Party and Labour Party (UK)

Republican platform 1

Republican platform 1 Crime

Republican platform 1 Economics

Republican platform 1 Feminism

Republican platform 1 LGBTQ

Republican platform 1 Migration

Republican platform 1 Military and internationalism/ Republican platform 1 Nation, political standing expanded and idpol

            Republican platform 1 Judaism/Islam I-P

            Republican platform 1 Russia




OR

Republican Platform 2

Create a sectarianism on the whole right (like between conservatives , right libertarians and Republicans) to by extension split Peter Thiel’s New Right/Post Liberal movement . 

This would be done to create a large variety of different strains of right wing thought that, can sadly lead to quite harsh disagreements between those that adhere to them. This would make the right wing as a whole have the same sectarianism that the left (including some left progressives but not including the Liberal 2.0)

This would thus make Peter Thiel’s New Right/Post Liberal movement move leftward and be as left of conservatives as Left Communism is left of Democratic Socialism or being as more libertarian of Republicans as Libertarian Socialism/Anarcho Communism is more libertarian of State Socialism/Marxism Leninism or being as distinct from right libertarianism as Mutualism and Left wing free market Anarchism are distinct of Maoism

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Exh bizaroousay

(from  Wikipedia ): "Despite their differences, Bizarro and Superman have teamed up on occasion. One notable example happened in Superman #379, when a strange creature appeared to be devouring Bizarros. Fearing he would end up alone Bizarro tried to steal Superman's duplicator ray. Superman convinced Bizarro he would be better off trying to stop the monster before making any more Bizarros.  The creature eventually devoured Bizarro, but Superman soon figured out that the creature was not trying to kill the Bizarros, but using their combined strength to defeat another creature which was trying to destroy htraE. The first creature was created as part of a plan developed by none other than the Bizarro Lex Luthor, who Bizarro referred to as a "punk hero." "In the imaginary story, Superman: Whatever Happened to the Man of Tomorrow?, which served as an ending to Silver Age Superman continuity, Bizarro #1 (the original Bizarro and the world's leader/greatest hero),
Read more

Exh demwmw

Saying that Joe Biden is better choice for the left wing than DJT instead of saying they are equally bad choices for the left wing, is excessive centrism and condemnable  Republicans take 10 steps backwards, Democrats take 1 step forward. Liberal 2.0ers call that progress. Leftists like me call it a f*cking disgrace. A lot of things that the Democrats campaign on and take credit for, were by and large grassroots campaigns by progressive groups. For example, the DNC really fought a lot of state-wide decriminalization attempts, that's why the first legalized states had to use voter referendums. Then you got issues like abortion and gay marriage, which were undone by the courts and NEVER codified into law by the Democrats, despite having many opportunities to do so. The DNC are NOT allies to us leftists, they are dangerous. Perhaps the Democrats are more dangerous than the GOP, since the Democrats take up the space of a left party, while they ignore grassroots leftist organizing and g
Read more

Exh libfemdfni

from here There is a practical component to all of this. The question of humanism vs antihumanism is the question upon which the debate between liberal feminism and nihilist gender abolitionism will be based. The liberal feminist says “I am a woman” and by that means that they are spiritually, ontologically, metaphysically, genetically, or any other modes of “essentially” a woman. The gender nihilist says “I am a woman” and means that they are located within a certain position in a matrix of power which constitutes them as such. The liberal feminist is not aware of the ways power creates gender, and thus clings to gender as a means of legitimizing themselves in the eyes of power. They rely on trying to use various systems of knowledge (genetic sciences, metaphysical claims about the soul, kantian ontology) in order to prove to power they can operate within it. The gender nihilist, the gender abolitionist, looks at the system of gender itself and see’s the violence at its core. We say n
Read more