I echo everything that Anya Parampil said to Tucker Carlson in this segment on Venezuela from 2019. I love how she owned/pwnd him (video titled "Journalist Anya Parampil Schools Fox News On Venezuela")
Both sides narrative: I am guessing to him the both sides are just as bad however considering his situation you have to realize he is fairly biased towards not liking the US government in general If anyone has a reason to still be mad about Hillary it's Edward Snowden. So take that fact in mind and realize you should not be listening to a thing Snowden says about the US election or government honestly now since he seems to be fully spite driven nowadays Edward Snowden's a smart guy (outside of politics at least), he should be able to realize that one side can be bad while still being better than the other side. Snowden is mad at the system, honestly his anger is more valid than a lot of the "viva la revolution" larpers in the US. He actually did things, physically took a risk, stood on his principles, stuff didn't pan out how he thought it should've and he's understandably angry and he is acting on that anger. It's why I said what can be done withi...
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/12/03/facebook-hate-speech/ From the article: "But before the overhaul, the company’s algorithms and policies did not make a distinction between groups that were more likely to be targets of hate speech versus those that have not been historically marginalized. Comments like “White people are stupid” were treated the same as anti-Semitic or racist slurs." I guess that white people haven't been historically marginalized, but according to Washington Post and Facebook, we can always start ... White people were on the margins of Eurasia for a thousand years This is the magical variable placeholder that is used to justify any amount of revanchist political action undertaken in modern times Simply choose an arbitrary time period and place that when the group who is in question was powerful, and then claim to be positioned athwart history to balance the scales. The more radical the action you choose to undertake today, the more po...
I ask political commentator Emma Vigeland (TYT/Majority report) in a way that the majorityreport youtube users would want challenge me on my views on women erasure (like below) and to have a discourse and a literal conversation with me about my views on women erasure to bring me leftward on that issue. Emma, at minimum tell give me ideas to better reframe my views on women erasure so I can get my point across without offending the Liberal 2.0ers and trans community. Ana and me are concerned about woman-mother erasure because cis women are under attack just like trans people are. In some places femicide is a huge threat, abortion access has been made harder for US women, and there is nihilism or waryness for feminism by Gen Zers (plus the rise of Andrew Tate's macho cultists). So cis women like Ana who are concerned with women-mother erasure deserve to have their voices heard too #letherspeak I acknowledge that trans-folks have a hard enough time as it is and that haphazard r...
Comments
Post a Comment